Volume 18, Issue 69 (3-2019)
QJCR 2019, 18(69): 79-105 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
choupani M, Sohrabifard M M, Mohammadi F, Esmaeli N, Samdifard A. The perception of unfaithful men (infidelity) of the causes and factors in preventing Extramarital relations: a qualitative study. QJCR 2019; 18 (69) :79-105
URL: http://irancounseling.ir/journal/article-1-498-en.html
URL: http://irancounseling.ir/journal/article-1-498-en.html
Allame Tabatabayi University
Abstract: (9151 Views)
Objective: Marital infidelity is a subject shocking for couples & common phenomenon in today's society that affect the dissolution of the family & couples divorce. The goal of this research qualitative study causes & factors inhibition of infidelity in unfaithful men. Methods: In the present qualitative research, the phenomenological approach was used. The study population consisted of all unfaithful men in the city Shahindezh, that after identifying a large number of them by the researcher, from among them using the purposive sampling method 12 man (who willing to establishing relationships with investigator & were interviewed) were selected to participate in the study & then were interviewed. All the interviews were tape-recorded & then transcribed verbatim & finally analyzed through method of interpretive analysis of Diekelmann, Allen, & Tanner. Results: The analysis of data from interviews led to identification of 51 primary codes, 9 subtheme & 3 main theme in the context of the cause's infidelity (1. Intrapersonal causes: sexual variety, lack of adherence to religious, Acquisition of self-confidence & Revenge. 2. Interpersonal causes: sexual dissatisfaction, emotional dissatisfaction & lack of commitment. 3. Environmental causes: preparation of infidelity situation & derangement of mate selection) & 23 Primary codes, 5 subtheme & 3 main theme in the context of inhibitor causes from marital infidelity (1. Interpersonal inhibitors: emotional satisfaction & sexual satisfaction. 2. Environmental inhibitors: eliminating the environmental provoking & release from selective compulsion 3. Intrapersonal inhibitors: religious adherence) in the infidelity men. Conclusion: The researchers & programmer of the field of marriage & family could by eliminating the causes of the tendency of the couples to the extramarital relationships & reinforcement of inhibitors factors in them & in their functional environment, to a large degree decrease the possibility of these people to extramarital affair & prepare the context of couple system stability & the unit of family.
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2016/12/17 | Accepted: 2019/08/6 | Published: 2019/08/6
Received: 2016/12/17 | Accepted: 2019/08/6 | Published: 2019/08/6
References
1. آرین‌فر، ن.، اعتمادی، ع. (1395). مقایسه اثربخشی زوج‌درمانی یکپارچه‌نگر و هیجان‌مدار بر صمیمیت زناشویی زوجین آسیب‌دیده از خیانت همسر. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های مشاوره، 15 (59)، 7_37.
2. چوپانی، م.، نعیمی، ا. (1395). بررسی کیفی تعهد علمی _ اخلاقی دانشجویان. فصلنامه فرهنگ مشاوره، 6 (21)، 80_100.
3. خدادادی‌سنگده، ج.، محمدنظری، ع.، حسنی، ج. (1394). تجارب والدین موفق در مورد خانواده موفق. مجله تحقیقات کیفی در علوم سلامت، 4 (2)، 178_190.
4. حمیدی، ا.، احمدی، س.، ویسانی، م. (1393). بررسی عوامل موثر بر شکل‌گیری خیانت زناشویی: یک مطالعه‌ی دلفی. همایش منطقه‌ای آسیب‌شناسی پدیده طلاق، سقز: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد سقز،
5. صص 1-9.
6. سودانی، م.، کریمی، ج.، مهرابی‌زاده‌هنرمند، م.، نیسی، ع. (1391). اثربخشی زوج‌درمانی هیجان‌مدار بر کاهش آسیب‌های ناشی از خیانت همسر. فصلنامه تحقیقات علوم رفتاری، 10 (4)، 258_266.
7. قره‌گوزلو، ن.، مرادحاصلی، م.، عطادخت، ا. (1396). مقایسه اثربخشی زوج‌درمانی شناختی _ رفتاری حضوری و مجازی بر اختلال استرس پس از سانحه در روابط فرازناشویی. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های مشاوره، 17 (65)، 187_206.
8. گال، م.، بورگ، و.، گال، ج. (2015). روش‌های تحقیق کمی و کیفی در علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی. مترجم احمدرضا نصراصفهانی، 1394، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی.
9. هنرپروران، ن. (1393). بررسی اثربخشی رویکرد پذیرش و تعهد (ACT) بر بخشش و سازگاری زناشویی زنان آسیب‌دیده از خیانت همسر. فصلنامه‌ی علمی _ پژوهشی زن و جامعه، 5 (2)، 135_150.
10. Abzug, R. (2016). Extramarital affairs as occupational hazard: A structural, ethical (cultural) model of opportunity. Sexualities Journal, 19 (1-2), 25_45. [DOI:10.1177/1363460715583586]
11. Barbaro, N., Pham, N. M., & Shachelford, K. T. (2015). Solving the problem of partner infidelity: Individual mate retention, coalitional mate retention, & in-pair copulation frequency. Personality & Individual Differences, 82 (1), 67_71. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.033]
12. Brewer, G., & Abell, L. (2015). Machiavellianism & sexual behavior: Motivations, deception & infidelity, Personality & Individual Differences, 74 (2), 186_191. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.028]
13. Brewer, G., Hunt, D., James, G., & Abell, L. (2015). Dark Triad traits, infidelity and romantic revenge. Personality & Individual Differences, 83 (1), 122_127. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.007]
14. Burchel, L. J., & Ward, J. (2011). Sex drive, attachment style, relationship status & previous infidelity as predictors of sex differences in romantic jealousy. Personality & Individual Differences, 51 (5), 657_661. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.002]
15. Diekelmann, N., Allen, D., & Tanner, C. A. (1989). The NLN criteria for appraisal of baccalaureate programs: a critical hermeneutic analysis. 6th ed. Washington, DC: National League for Nursing.
16. Eindor, T., Perrypaldi, A., Hirschberger, G., Birnbaum, G. E., & Deutsch, D. (2015). Coping with mate poaching: Gender differences in detection of infidelity-related threats. Evolution & Human Behavior, 36 (1), 17-24. [DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.08.002]
17. Guba, E. G., Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. New York, NY: Sage Publications.
18. Jenkins, Q. T. (2015). Husband's response infidelity. PHD thesis. University of Kentucky, Kentucky.
19. Jones, N. D., & Weiser, A. D. (2014). Differential infidelity patterns among the Dark Triad. Personality & Individual Differences, 57 (1), 209_241 [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2013.09.007]
20. Labrecque, L. T., & Whisman, M. A. (2017). Attitudes toward and prevalence of extramarital sex & descriptions of extramarital partners in the 21st century. Journal of Family Psychology, 31 (7), 952_957. [DOI:10.1037/fam0000280]
21. Lalasz, B. C., & Weigel, J. D. (2011). Understanding the relationship between gender & extra dyadic relations: The mediating role of sensation seeking on intentions to engage in sexual infidelity. Personality & Individual Differences, 50 (7), 1079_1083. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.029]
22. Mark, K. P., Janssen, E., & Milhausen, R. R. (2011). Infidelity in heterosexual couples: demographic, interpersonal, & personality-related predictors of extra dyadic sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior; 40 (5), 971_982. [DOI:10.1007/s10508-011-9771-z]
23. Mtenga, S. M., Pfeiffer, C., Tanner, M., Geubbels, E., & Merten, S. (2018). Linking gender, extramarital affairs, & HIV: a mixed methods study on contextual determinants of extramarital affairs in rural Tanzania. AIDS Research & Therapy, 15 (1), 12_12. [DOI:10.1186/s12981-018-0199-6]
24. Pacher, A. (2017). Extramarital affairs in contemporary Japan: Current situation & trends. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 14 (5), 300_310. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.04.446]
25. Shackelford, T., Besser, A., & Goetz, A. T. (2008). Personality, marital satisfaction, & probability of marital infidelity. Individual Difference Research, 6 (1), 13_25.
26. Speziale, H., Streubert, H., & Carpenter, D. R. (2007). Qualitative research in nursing: advancing the humanistic imperative. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
27. Staples, J. (2012). Couples' Process of healing from while in therapy. PHD thesis, University of Nevada, Reno.
28. Starratt, V. G., Poop, D., & Shachelford, K. T. (2008). Not all men are sexually coercive: A preliminary investigation of the moderating effect of mate desirability on the relationship between female infidelity & male sexual coercion. Personality & Individual Differences, 45 (1), 10_14. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2008.02.010]
29. Stieglizt, J., Gurven, M., Kaplan, H., & Winking, J. (2012). Infidelity, jealousy, & wife abuse among Tsimane forager-farmers: testing evolutionary hypotheses of marital conflict. Personality & Individual Differences, 33 (5), 438_448. [DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.12.006]
30. Tsapelas, I., Fisher, HE., & Aron, A. (2010) "Infidelity: when, where, why. New York: Routledge.
31. Weiser, A. D., & Weigel, J. D. (2015). Personality & individual differences. Personality & Individual Differences, 85 (1), 176_181. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.014]
32. Zare, B. (2011). Review of study on infidelity. International conference on advanced management science, IACSIT Press, Singapore.
33. Zengel, B., Edlund, E. J., & Sagrin, J. B. (2013). Sex differences in jealousy in response to infidelity: evaluation of demographic moderators in a national random sample. Personality & Individual Differences, 54 (1), 47_51. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2012.08.001]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
