Volume 19, Issue 74 (7-2020)                   QJCR 2020, 19(74): 182-211 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kaveh A, Hasanzadeh R, Mirzaeian B. The Effectiveness of Developmental Therapies (VAK Learning Style) with Cognitive Information Processing Approach in Treatment of Cognitive Dyslexia. QJCR 2020; 19 (74) :182-211
URL: http://irancounseling.ir/journal/article-1-1254-en.html
Corresponding Author): Doctor of General Psychology, Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran.
Abstract:   (7489 Views)
Aim: The purpose of the present study is to determine the effectiveness of developmental therapies based on cognitive information processing approach on improvement of dyslexia in 7 to 9 years old children with learning disabilities in Alborz province. Methods: The method of this research is pre-test; post-test, with control group. The statistical population of this study consists of 60 persons, 30 of whom were placed in treatment group and 30 were placed in the control group. Prior to treatment interventions, IQ was assessed using Wechsler IV test, signs and symptoms of dyslexia was assessed with Cattell Horn Carroll's developmental therapies approach, ISHINR and cognitive information processing and learning style of students, parents, therapists and teachers was measured and evaluated using VAK Questionnaire. Then the students were divided into three separate groups of visual, auditory and kinesthetic based on their gender, age, educational level, learning style and considering the study goal. Thereafter, the training sessions were held within two months for these three groups. The students attended 15 ninety-minute training sessions along with their parents, while the control group did not receive any training.  Results: The data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) method and the results showed that there is a significant difference (5%) between all of the three treatments groups in comparison with the control group, so all the three treatments methods are effective. Conclusion: Developmental therapies (VAK learning style) utilizing cognitive information-processing approach are effective in the treatment of cognitive dyslexia.
Full-Text [PDF 1596 kb]   (10785 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2020/01/8 | Accepted: 2020/02/15 | Published: 2020/08/26

References
1. − احمدی، سمانه (1397). بررسی علل و راهکارهای درمان اختلال خواندن (نارساخوانی). سیویلیکا. چهارمین همایش علمی پژوهشی استانی از نگاه معلم. میناب. آموزش و پرورش شهرستان میناب.
2. − افشاری، علی، رضایی، رسول (1398). اثربخشی نرم‌افزار ساند اسمارت بر کارکردهای اجرائی (توجه متمرکز، توانایی سازماندهی و برنامه‌ریزی و حافظه‌‌ی کاری شنیداری و دیداری) دانش‌آموزان مبتلا به نارساخوانی. ناتوانی‌های یادگیری، 8 (3)، 26-48.
3. − بشرپور، سجاد، عیسی‌زادگان، علی، احمدیان، لیلا (1391). نارسایی‌های پردازش اطلاعات حسی در کودکان مبتلا به ناتوانی‌های یادگیری. ناتوانی‌های یادگیری، 2 (1)، 25-42.
4. − حیدری، خدابخش (1387). کودکان مبتلا به اختلا ‌ل‌های یادگیری. اصفهان: انتشارات نوشته.
5. − رحمتی، ندا. (1397).اثربخشی مهارت‌های فراشناختی بر توانایی‌های شناختی و سبک‌های یادگیری دانش‌آموزان نارساخوان. فصل‌نامه‌ی جامعه‌شناسی آموزش و پرورش، 6(6)، 79-86 .
6. − رحیمی، محمد (1392). اختلالات ویژه ی یادگیری. قم: انتشارات سپهر اندیشه.
7. − رحیمی، محمد (1398). اختلال نارساخوانی شناختی. قم: انتشارات بانیان دانش.
8. − رسولی‌نژاد، سید اصغر، رسولی نژاد، سید وحید (1386). بررسی سبک یادگیری دانشجویان پیراپزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کاشان در سال ۱۳۸۴، نشریه‌ی گام‌های توسعه در آموزش پزشکی، 3 (1)، 26-32.
9. − زاب، م. جانت. (2007). شناخت درمانی تحولی برای بزرگسالان (ترجمه‌ی حسن حمیدپور. (1390)). تهران: انتشارات ارجمند.
10. − سرکانی، عبدالرضا، فرامرزی، سالار (1398). اثربخشی آموزش پردازش حسی بر بهبود مهارت‌های عصب‌روان شناختی دانش‌آموزان نارساخوان. فصل‌نامه‌ی علمی ـ پژوهشی عصب روان‌شناسی، 5 (16)، 91-106.
11. − کرک، ساموئل الکساندر، گلاگر، جیمز، آناستازیوف، نیکولا، کلمن، ماری (1388).آموزش وپرورش کودکان استثنائی (ترجمه‌ی مهدی گنجی). تهران: انتشارات ساوالان.
12. − گوین، رید (1392). نارساخوانی: راهنمای کامل والدین (ترجمه‌ی عصمت دانش و علیرضا سلیمی نیا). تهران: انتشارا19ت ارجمند.
13. − مؤمنی شهرکی، فرزانه، ملک‌پور، مختار، عابدی، احمد، فرامرزی، سالار (1397). مقایسه‌ی اثربخشی مداخلات عصب روان‌شناختی و روش دیویس بر عملکرد خواندن دانش‌آموزان نارساخوان پایه‌ی اول و دوم ابتدایی. فصل‌نامه‌ی علمی ـ پژوهشی عصب روان‌شناسی، 4 (12)، 153-174.
14. − Abu-Hamour, B., & Al Hmouz, H. (2018). Cattell-Horn-Carroll broad cognitive ability profiles for dyslexia and intellectual disability. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1-17. [DOI:10.1080/13603116.2018.1534999]
15. − Abu-Hamour, B., & Al-Hmouz, H. (2016). Prevalence and pattern of learning difficulties in primary school students in Jordan. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 21 (2) , 99-113. [DOI:10.1080/19404158.2017.1287104]
16. − American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub. [DOI:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596]
17. − Benson, N. (2008). Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive abilities and reading achievement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 26 (1) , 27-41. [DOI:10.1177/0734282907301424]
18. − Bonacina, S., Lanzi, P. L., Lorusso, M. L., & Antonietti, A. (2015). Improving reading skills in students with dyslexia: the efficacy of a sublexical training with rhythmic background. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 1510. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01510]
19. − Broadhead, M., Daylamani-Zad, D., Mackinnon, L., & Bacon, L. (2018). A multisensory 3D environment as intervention to aid reading in dyslexia: A proposed framework. In 2018 10th International Conference on Virtual Worlds and Games for Serious Applications (VS-Games) (pp. 1-4). IEEE. [DOI:10.1109/VS-Games.2018.8493407]
20. − Caemmerer, J. M., Maddocks, D. L., Keith, T. Z., & Reynolds, M. R. (2018). Effects of cognitive abilities on child and youth academic achievement: Evidence from the WISC-V and WIAT-III. Intelligence, 68, 6-20. [DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2018.02.005]
21. − Çakiroğlu, Ü., Güler, M., Atabay, M., & Güler, M. (2019). Connections Between Learning Styles and Perceived Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning: An Experimental Study. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 0047239519844509. [DOI:10.1177/0047239519844509]
22. − Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. J. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities, 35 (5) , 386-406. [DOI:10.1177/00222194020350050101]
23. − Clark, D.B. (2009). Dyslexia: Theory and practice of Parkton. M.D: York Press.
24. − Cormier, D. C., Bulut, O., McGrew, K. S., & Frison, J. (2016). The role of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities in predicting writing achievement during the school‐age years. Psychology in the Schools, 53 (8) , 787-803. [DOI:10.1002/pits.21945]
25. − Crastnopol, M. (2009). Coming to terms with invisible disability-Beyond empathic resonance: Commentary on paper by Lauren Levine. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19 (4) , 474-479. [DOI:10.1080/10481880903088617]
26. − Flanagan, D. P., & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.). (2012). Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. Guilford Press.
27. − Flanagan, D. P., & Kaufman, A. S. (2009). Essentials of WISC-IV assessment (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
28. − Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., Alfonso, V. C., & Mascolo, J. T. (2006). Achievement test desk reference: A guide to learning disability identification. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley and Sons. Psychology, 83, 517-544.
29. − Floyd, R., Meisinger, E., Gregg, N., & Keith, T. (2012). An explanation of reading comprehension across development using models from Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory: Support for integrative models of reading. Psychology in the Schools, 49 (8) , 725-743. [DOI:10.1002/pits.21633]
30. − Gori, S., Seitz, A. R., Ronconi, L., Franceschini, S., & Facoetti, A. (2016). Multiple causal links between magnocellular-dorsal pathway deficit and developmental dyslexia. Cerebral Cortex, 26 (11) , 4356-4369. [DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhv206]
31. − Hagman, J. O., Wood, F., Buchsbaum, M. S., Tallal, P., Flowers, L., & Katz, W. (1992). Cerebral brain metabolism in adult dyslexic subjects assessed with positron emission tomography during performance of an auditory task. Archives of Neurology, 49 (7) , 734-739. [DOI:10.1001/archneur.1992.00530310082015]
32. − Harris, L. V. A., Sadowski, M. S., & Birchman, J. A. (2009). A comparison of learning style models and assessment instruments for university graphics educators. The Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 70 (1).
33. − Ibrahim, R. H., & Hussein, D. A. (2016). Assessment of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning style among undergraduate nursing students. Int J Adv Nurs Stud, 5, 1-4. [DOI:10.14419/ijans.v5i1.5124]
34. − Iliadou, V., Bamiou, D. E., Kaprinis, S., Kandylis, D., & Kaprinis, G. (2009). Auditory Processing Disorders in children suspected of Learning Disabilities-A need for screening?. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 73 (7) , 1029-1034. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.04.004]
35. − Knoop‐van Campen, C. A., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2018). The modality and redundancy effects in multimedia learning in children with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 24 (2) , 140-155. [DOI:10.1002/dys.1585]
36. − Larivée, S., Normandeau, S., & Parent, S. (2000). The French connection: Some contributions of French‐language research in the post‐piagetian era. Child Development, 71 (4) , 823-839. [DOI:10.1111/1467-8624.00188]
37. − Lerner, J. W., & Johns, B. (2008). Learning disabilities and related mild disabilities: Characteristics, Teaching Strategies, and New Directions. England: Wadsworth Publishing.
38. − Lipowska, M., Łada, A. B., Pawlicka, P., & Jurek, P. (2019). The use of the Warnke Method in dyslexia therapy for children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 64 (4) , 101060. [DOI:10.1016/j.appdev.2019.101060]
39. − Mayes, S. D., & Calhoun, S. L. (2006). Frequency of reading, math, and writing disabilities in children with clinical disorders. Learning and individual Differences, 16 (2) , 145-157. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2005.07.004]
40. − McGrew, K. S., & Wendling, B. J. (2010). Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive‐achievement relations: What we have learned from the past 20 years of research. Psychology in the Schools, 47 (7) , 651-675. [DOI:10.1002/pits.20497]
41. − Monica ,O. (2017). The relationship between CHC factors by the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, the fourth edition and reading skills, measured by Widlock-Johnson's Wide-Reading Cluster. PROQuest Number.10606842.MA
42. − National Center for Learning Disabilities. (2010) | NCLD.org - NCLD. Retrieved August 1, 2013, from: http://www.ncld.org/.
43. − Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological science in the public interest, 9 (3) , 105-119. [DOI:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x]
44. − Pollock, J. & Waller, E. (1994). Day-to-Day dyslexia in the classroom. London and New York, Routledge.
45. − Poon-McBrayer, K. F. (2012). Bridging policy-practice gap: Protecting rights of youth with learning disabilities in Hong Kong. Children and Youth Services Review, 34 (9) , 1909-1914. [DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.06.002]
46. − Ramus, F. (2003). Developmental dyslexia: specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction?. Current opinion in neurobiology, 13 (2) , 212-218. [DOI:10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00035-7]
47. − Reber, A. S. (1985). The Penguin dictionary of psychology. London: Penguin Books.
48. − Reid, G. (2003). Dyslexia: A practitioner's handbook. John Wiley & Sons.
49. − Schiff, R., & Raveh, M. (2007). Deficient morphological processing in adults with developmental dyslexia: Another barrier to efficient word recognition?. Dyslexia, 13 (2) , 110-129. [DOI:10.1002/dys.322]
50. − Sharma, M., Purdy, S. C., Newall, P., Wheldall, K., Beaman, R., & Dillon, H. (2006). Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of auditory processing deficits in children with reading disorder. Clinical neurophysiology, 117 (5) , 1130-1144. [DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.02.001]
51. − Shaywitz, S. E. (1998). Current concepts: Dyslexia. The New England Journal of Medicine, 338 (5) , 307-312. [DOI:10.1056/NEJM199801293380507]
52. − Shaywitz, S. E., Morris, R., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2008). The education of dyslexic children from childhood to young adulthood. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 59, 451-475. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093633]
53. − Smith, P. L., (2004). Instructional design. John Wiley & Sons.
54. − Toffalini E, Marsura M, Garcia RB, Cornoldi C. (2019). A Cross-Modal Working Memory Binding Span Deficit in Reading Disability. Journal of learning Disabilities. 52: 2, 99-108. [DOI:10.1177/0022219418786691]
55. − Van Doren, C. M. (2018). CHC Narrow and Broad Processes as Predictors of Basic Reading Achievement (Doctoral dissertation, California State University, Fresno).
56. − Wajuihian, S. O., & Naidoo, K. S. (2011). Dyslexia: An overview. African Vision and Eye Health, 70 (2) , 89-98. [DOI:10.4102/aveh.v70i2.102]
57. − Wechsler, D. (1991). Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children: Third Edition manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
58. − Wechsler, D. (2003b). WISC-IV: Technical and interpretation manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
59. − Woodcock, S., & Jiang, H. (2013). Teachers' causal attributional responses of students with learning disabilities in China. Learning and individual differences, 25, 163-170. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.016]
60. − Zaboski II, B. A., Kranzler, J. H., & Gage, N. A. (2018). Meta-analysis of the relationship between academic achievement and broad abilities of the Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory. Journal of school psychology, 71, 42-56. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2018.10.001]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Counseling Research