Showing 5 results for Academic Performance
, , , , ,
Volume 12, Issue 48 (10-2013)
Abstract
The aim of this research was to investigate the effectiveness of logo therapy on life satisfaction and academic performance in high school female students in MasjedSoleiman city. The research method was semi experimental with per-posttest, follow-up and control group. The sample consisted of 40 subjects who were matched from age, educational status, gender, having one standard deviation below the mean in life satisfaction scale (MSLSS). Then randomly divided into two group as experimental and control. The instruments were(MSLSS) and academic performance. The data were analysed with (MANCOVA). The results indicated that there was a significant difference between experimental and control group (P< 0.0001). These results significantly persisted after follow up period. .
Zahra Naghsh, Zahra Ramezanie, Leila Afzali, Zahra Afkari Shahrestani,
Volume 18, Issue 69 (3-2019)
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of socioeconomic status on individual and combination effects, and resilience to academic performance. Methods: For this purpose, 600 students who were selected by two stage cluster sampling methodology completed the Martin and Marsh Resiliency Questionnaire (2006) and their parents answered the International Socioeconomic Status Questionnaire. TIMSS (Which is repeated every four years for the country's performance in science and mathematics education to determine the trend of educational change and even the rate of decline and increased performance of students in participating countries after these years). Parents were also identified in three groups with high socioeconomic status, moderate, and low levels of this variable. Findings: Multilevel structural Equation Model was used to study and analyze the data. The results showed that socioeconomic status had a significant direct effect on academic performance in both levels of the student and the family, and the effect of resilience on academic performance was significant. Conclusions: The model has a good fit and 22% of students' performance variance at the student level and 28% of the variance in the performance of students at the family level was explained.
Seyed Hadi Ansar-Al-Hossaini, Mohammad Reza Abedi, Parisa Nilforooshan,
Volume 19, Issue 75 (12-2020)
Abstract
Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of career adaptability counseling on academic engagement and performance. Methods: The method of this study was quasi-experimental with pre-test, post-test and follow up design with a control group. The statistical population of the study consisted of all first-grade male students in Isfahan middle schools in the 2017-18 academic year. Fifty students were randomly selected and allocated randomly into two experimental (n=25) and control (n=25) groups. Pre-test was performed for both groups. The experimental group received seven 75-minute career adaptability counseling sessions using Savikas’s career counseling method (Hartong & Vess, 2016). The post-test was administered at the end of counseling sessions. Then the follow-up test was performed for both groups after one month. Academic engagement questionnaire (Arshambolt, et al., 2009) was used to measure the academic engagement. Also, the mean grades on final exam during the first semester and on the midterm exam in the second semester were considered as post-test evaluation. Similarly, second semester final exam grades were used as follow up of students' academic performance. The results of variance analysis with repeated measurement indicated that career adaptability counseling had an impact on academic engagement and performance. Furthermore, paired comparison test in three stages of pre-test, post-test and follow-up showed that the mean scores increased in the post-test (p <0.01) and remained stable into the follow-up. The results of the present study indicate that career adaptability counseling is an effective method for increasing the impact of academic engagement and performance.
Vafa Mostafa, Hajar Falahzadeh, Sorur Ahmadi, Omid Hamidi,
Volume 20, Issue 79 (10-2021)
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to test the structural equation model of relationships between attachment styles and self-differentiation with academic performance of university students with the mediating role of health-promoting lifestyle. Methods: The method of this research was descriptive and correlation type. The statistical population consisted of all undergraduate students of Shahid Beheshti University (1554 people) in the academic year of 2018-2019. The sample size was estimated to be 308 based on Cochran formula. Eventually 305 questionnaires were finalized. Research tools included the Self-Distinction Questionnaire (Skowron & Schmitt, 2003), the Adults Attachment Inventory (AAI) (Hazen and Shaver, 1987), the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile (Walker, Sichrist & Pender, 1995) and the Educational Performance Test (Pham and Taylor, 1999) were used and data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistical methods (Pearson correlation, path analysis and structural equation modeling) using SPSS 23 and AMOS 26 statistical softwares. Findings: The results showed that attachment styles and self-differentiation have a significant relationship with academic performance and these variables are able to directly predict academic performance (p<0.01). Promotional lifestyles can also play a mediating role between attachment styles and self-differentiation with academic performance (p<0.01). Conclusion: Regarding the relationship between attachment styles, self-differentiation and health-promoting lifestyle with academic performance, special attention to these variables is necessary to improve student performance.
Hossein Hedayat Khozani, Ilnaz Sajjadian, Ahmad Abedi, Mohammadreza Abedi,
Volume 23, Issue 89 (6-2024)
Abstract
Aim: Academic Performance is one of the issues raised in the field of education, which not only affects the academic future of students from various dimensions, but also determines their fate in various fields. Therefore, the current research was conducted with the aim of comparing the effectiveness of an educational package to prevent academic procrastination as well as treatment based on acceptance and commitment on academic motivation and performance of procrastinating students. Methods: The research method was semi-experimental with a pre-test, post-test and follow-up design with a control group. The statistical population included all secondary school students suffering from academic procrastination in city of Isfahan. Among them, 45 people were selected by purposive sampling and randomly divided into two experimental groups (educational package to prevent academic procrastination and treatment based on acceptance and commitment) and a control group (15 people in each group). Research tools included academic procrastination questionnaires (Solomon and Rothblum, 1984), academic motivation (Abdkhodaei et al., 2017) and academic performance (Pham and Taylor, 1999). In order to analyze the data, analysis of variance with repeated measurements was used. Results: The findings showed that the educational package of prevention of academic procrastination and treatment based on acceptance and commitment had a significant effect on the academic motivation and academic performance of procrastinating students (p<0.001) and there is a significant difference between the two interventions, so that the educational package to prevent academic procrastination has been more effective. Conclusion: Those involved in the field of student education are recommended to use the educational package to prevent academic procrastination in order to solve students' academic problems, especially to improve academic motivation and academic performance
